Thread:Hackey5/@comment-27022259-20160530165918/@comment-25407271-20160603222314

Prime,

I apologise for mocking your idea, I found it too basic and not necessary. I am sure that posting a page showing the timezones in which the staff are online is redundant and is not improving anything at all. The only people that are not covering the timezones of most our staff are Hackey, IceKane and Rrobertus. The rest of us are in the same continent (and countries) and therefore share a time difference of minutes and a few hours (in your case).


 * Epicbloxxy, Sliceanddice23, ZOptic, and you (Unknown, Ohio, Michigan, and California respectively) share the same country (United States) and no big gaps on timezones.


 * Master and I (Valencia and Zulia respectively) are in the same country (Venezuela) which means we have the same timezone.


 * All of us share the same time in the chat. It is us who are there every day, every time, or have you not realised that yet?

You seem to be ignorant in terms of my "opinion being shared one month before I left". This thread is both ZOptic and I's idea, every thing, every idea shared here by ZOptic went through my hands before posting. I have also visited the chat every so often since I stopped coming and shared my ideas in there just so no one would say what you just said, but seemed not to be saying on these occasions.

I also do not mean that we choose all the staff, but we are here to judge whether they fill the rank or not. It does not work if Hackey just promotes them and we judge them after they have been promoted. Let the community say who they want and let us judge, that is how it works, and believe me it does work. Promotions shall not happen if us staff are 100% agreeing to it.

Hackey,

It is not determined whether I am back or not, but ZOptic nearly bought a plane ticket to Venezuela to convince me of speaking here. Good to see you, too. What a wacky comeback meeting we are having.

I still do not agree on having all of our moderators promoted to their highest rank yet. Promote one, or two, and that will do, it is all I am saying. What do we need 6 Content Moderators for anyway? I have requested 3 particular moderators to demote themselves (and I am coming for the other 3) of that position until we clarify everything going on here, as we need to discuss whether or not they can have that position beforehand. I understand the positive wave you are trying to send, but what needs to be done, needs to be done, and that is why I am here.

Once again, I repeat: "...let the community say who they want and let us judge, that is how it works, and believe me it does work. Promotions shall not happen if us staff are 100% agreeing to it."

It is already mentioned multiple times that we are struggling with time. Prime is having these piano presentations and life matters, you are having whatever you are having, and I deal with a crisis of the highest magnitude, but here we are, discussing and creating an assembly. This is the type of discussions I want us to have, us sitting and mentioning the pros and cons of every thing, not one single person deciding on behalf of 3.