Thread:ZOptic/@comment-5645428-20170301114424/@comment-5645428-20170302085910

Nusdan, I'm not questioning your loyalty. In fact, I dislike that terminology because one is loyal to their ruler, and I am by no means anyone's ruler. The message was addressed to ZOptic; Nusdan, you've gotten yourself involved, so we proceed as such.

Nusdan wrote: "I am in no way associated to ZOptic's message." Nusdan wrote: "I am going to step in because I was behind the scenes of ZOptic's message and we were addressing messages to each other as to how he could make his response exact and "factual". However, I goofed particular aspects of his message that now I see were misleading. Nonetheless... " ZOptic wrote: "Hackey, this was none of Nusdan's doing. Please do not think he is the mastermind of all of this. The entire reply was written by me and only me. "

Contradiction. What seems apparent is poor wording that has led to multiple misunderstandings. If you want to tell me to communicate more, it's not complicated. If you want to tell me that you think I am not active enough and I am overlooking the community's needs and dynamics, just say it. My answer is as I said, I am busy and I invest my time and efforts as I feel is most appropriate. I do what I am able to within reason, and I will make note to communicate my approaches more in the future. You really butchered that message if you were intending to make a simple point.