Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25407271-20160713184211/@comment-27022259-20160714173944

Nusdan's definition is wrong, which is why I gave the definition according to Wikipedia.

The same argument may be applied to what you are saying as well; not everyone agrees to have it implemented either.

The debate over what is NSFW here is irrelevant to me. If you are going to counter-act my argument with points that are beginning "if we do implement the tag" then those are invalid to me. I have already established what the meaning of NSFW is, there does not need to be a debate over it.

Listen, I will not support the implementation of this tag. I could go on and on about how wrong this is and have a stalemate argument for ages, but I will just say that this rule is quite vapid and a waste of our time. This will not make the wiki better for anyone. Literally the only benefit I can think of is that it will get moderators more edits. Other than that, a complete waste of our time. NSFW content should not be labeled, it should be removed. If someone thinks Kaz's horrible sex jokes are "completely inappropriate", they should not be here.

I mean, really, who was deeply offended by the jokes on here lately anyways? We haven't had to label things as "NSFW" and we have been doing just fine, why would we just now need it?