Thread:Nusdan/@comment-26481819-20150813053628/@comment-24738360-20150814072434

Great idea Irber, although this Process idea does have some major flaws in it.

I suppose I can't really comment about my own preferences, as I do not moderate/edit on this Wikia, but I suppose I could point on some things.

1. The CM/Moderator for 45 days rule is a bit redundant, as the role of an Admin usually does not include the mderation of a talk chat, or the forums. 45 Days is a long time for a person who is seeking for an Admin role, maybe you can shorten this to 20 days?.

2. Activeness on a Wikia, and amount of edits should not really factor in choosing an Admin. I have to oppose with this, since 4 months is a very long time, and 700 edits..?? I am a storng believer in counting general edits to articles (Quality edits) Rather than counting the edit total as a whole. This rule for 700 edits is a bit too much for a person, and should be shortened to around 100-300. In a scenario case, what if a new editor just joined the GD Wikia. He has been editing for around 2 months, and has made amazing; quality edits to articles. Would you promote him, or not? According to the 4 month rule, you could not promote him since he has not been an editor for 4 months.

3. I have to oppose the idea of users having to be over the age of 13 to become Admins. Maturity doesn't come with age. We could have a very mature 10 year old ediitng on the GD Wikia, and a 17 year old who thinks it's funny to vandalize and troll. A better suggestion to this would be to possibly interview this candidate to see if his maturity levels meet the standards of an Admin.

Other than those 3 things, I can't really find any flaws in this idea.

-Andy (Hey, I did this without bringing up what we do on the K-... .Wik-......Nevermind)