Thread:Hackey5/@comment-25407271-20151130040133/@comment-5645428-20151130062325

1. That should be fine for 'Administrator'. I recently noticed that Wikia have in fact updated [forum] Moderator to read Discussions Moderator, so we've also got that covered.

2. Distinguishing staff is commonplace across most wikis and it serves that users, especially those who are new, can identify them quickly and easily for whatever purpose, and it also helps to remember them better. It's standard convention, and believe me, is far less intrusive than you'll find elsewhere, with text-shadows, ::after extensions, images and even gifs!

3. I think I left the local staff listed in the CSS for highlighting as it is not affected by the delayed loading of the JS, which would be quite conspicuous with our usernames appearing often around the place, and, as you mentioned, being able to remove inactive staff who still hold their rights. However, it might be worth trialling, so I'll keep this in mind.

4. Our timezone difference would probably be the issue in terms of our perceived chat activity. I always encounter Shuddervolt and Rrobertus02 (almost daily), while you'd probably be seeing Slice and ZOptic most of them time. Communication is the big thing here, so thanks indeed for posting this message. That's how you do it. :) Could you give me some details about ZOptic's project?

5. Remember that the moderator title is two things, 'moderator' and 'title'. I'd give it that ZOptic rightfully deserves the title, but also encourage him to participate on the forum as well to fulfill the moderator side of it. I noticed that you promoted NitroSwipe again. I haven't seen him too often on the chat myself, so once more, see that our staff are as active as is convenient for them in order to strengthen their connection with the community.

6. I haven't been doing too much coding myself as of late. But there is something I have not started at all, the three editors. If you would like to start injecting straight into the main code, pull up a new Editor Elements section and see what you can do there. Good luck!

7. Bureaucrat rights have never really been a major thing in my past, because actually, I ended up with them only when the former management became inactive or felt that they would start decreasing in their own involvement and would need someone to work the user rights later on. That is literally all you get from being a bureaucrat, barely noteworthy compared to the rest of privileges you get as an administrator. I've always regarded it more of an analogical flag than a sceptre, the latter which all administrators hold and what enables them their abilities. That is what people recognise, a flag not meaning much in that light. Rest assured, you will likely make the next bureaucrat, never rushed, and when the circumstances call for it.

Thanks again for bringing these things to my attention. :)

In addition, we also have:
 * The staff conduct announcement, I touched on this earlier, we should get it out in the coming days.
 * The video replacements, now would be a great time that we both start directing our attention towards this.
 * Determining the release of the earlier map packs is something we haven't yet done. We'll need help from whoever was around during v1.6 or earlier.
 * And the Level Showcasing, this will be up and running very soon.