Board Thread:Wiki General Discussion/@comment-5645428-20161128000548/@comment-27791752-20161130024234

Nusdan wrote: The policy envisions that actions are to be made when a user is compromising another user's integrity through different behaviours. The policy does not state that the language handled in the wiki must stay in a range of little to none profanity because you cannot manage such thing.

This being said it is where my argument persists; it is only relevant if said profanity is directed at people or at one another in the case of an argument.

I am truthfully disappointed that 15 of every 20 persons associated with the thread opposing have given absolutely no deduction or rational debate to support their opinion. It is all based on your parents, but I do not see any of you saying: "Oh, I better not watch this porn video! What if my parents catch me!?", right? You still watch it, do you not?

Keep your hypocrisy and your redundancy out of here. I bow to those who really made sense.

I want to specifically pull out this quote: This being said it is where my argument persists; it is only relevant if said profanity is directed at people or at one another in the case of an argument. I define a curse word as any word that may be used to offend another individual. Mild profanity may be acceptable if it is used to express frustration towards events happening to oneself, but to direct it towards another person is not ethical. Cursing should not be allowed in an attacking manner.