Thread:Hackey5/@comment-25407271-20160905235534/@comment-25407271-20160917143033

There is not really a noticeable .JPG & .PNG extension difference. ".PNG" enables transparency and has improved image quality while .JPG makes images portable (average quality) & lighter. It would be convenient to use .JPG images as they are easier to handle, lighter and faster when it comes to upload. The quality loss is only noticeable when the size is too big (1280 x 720 and above) and it is not really a big deal. However, we have somehow acquired all images in .PNG formats so I do not think we should bother replacing everything yet. We are good as we are now.

About the background, I think that we can apply what I told you a long time ago. Is there a way we can use CSS selectors to set different background sizes for the most common resolution amongst users? Most common resolutions are:


 * 1280 x 720 (this is not common, but it is the lower 'high quality' resolution you can get)


 * 1360 x 768 (laptops, mostly)


 * 1366 x 768 (laptops, mostly)


 * 1440 x 900 (not common at all, but can still be found on the internet here and there)


 * 1680 x 1050


 * 1920 x 1080 (highest resolution you can hit; popular amongst computer users and I would be able to test this one)

As for the rest of users, the background that we have will suffice. This is a tedious task, however, so we would have to think a little before we even attempt.