Thread:ZOptic/@comment-5645428-20170301114424/@comment-25407271-20170301224248

I am going to step in because I was behind the scenes of ZOptic's message and we were addressing messages to each other as to how he could make his response exact and "factual". However, I goofed particular aspects of his message that now I see were misleading. Nonetheless...

I agreed to the idea of the inadequate interaction that arose from you to us (let us face it, we are the people operating this place after all and the moderators had no idea what was going on and some of them do not even know yet). I was upset by this, and I was also bothered by the there were opportunities for you to speak up regarding my actions comment, as it had become late and you already had done it. Your mistake was to assume we would know what you wanted to do, and therefore we would speak up out of assumption, but you seem to have conceded this part, so I need not state this anymore.

When he refers to people being cautious of you, he does not mean they fear your emotionally. He means that people do not risk to argue with you anything that involves the growth of the wiki because you have conveyed the image of imposition, an image that you cannot refute.

I have a life outside the wiki. I do not frequently have time to procrastinate or make small talk, that which constitutes most threads and chat content (that is why I am suggesting we try new strategies to encourage more meaningful discussion).

There is no dissent here and I can relate to this part of your life granted my university times. However, you must understand that your deficit of attendance and internal staff interaction is quite the bummer. We are not demanding your name twenty-four hours a week omnipresent, but rather a more steady presence in places where we can adequately mention each other of anything that pops up to our minds correlated to the rise of the place or a simple garbage/off-topic exchange like we have done loads of times you and me.