Thread:Hackey5/@comment-4189499-20150409024114/@comment-5645428-20150410132112


 * Everyone seems to like Chrome for all the same reasons, yet, wouldn't it be that much more convenient to have the URL always visible and the search term preserved between searches? That kind of individuality after all the popular browsers ditched the dual bars is certainly something I respect the Firefox browser for.


 * The content body background opacity was specifically chosen so it sits midway between a transparent frame (noting the border outline) and frosted glass. Its contrast I think is fine, but among the aspects I'd preferably change, it'd probably just be the background image itself, into a larger size and softer gradient as you're saying. You get used to it pretty fast. I might make a poll on the background elements, actually.


 * Well, I made a vast template update and corrected a great heap of code. Thanks for your advice, although I've still got a long way to go! However, I would advise against using external documentation for a number of reasons. Plainly, it creates additional pages to have to deal with, it divides the description/syntax from the template itself and therefore can't simultaneously be edited, and it makes category management far more tedious (a specific case being if ever a need arises to rename categories, where it prevents a useful JS tool from working properly). As you have indicated, it serves to understand how templates work in order to achieve optimal usage.

Once again, thanks for addressing a number of issues here! I wouldn't mind lending a hand myself an any of your wikis should anyone need some small help. I'll have a fair amount of spare time in the coming weeks and plenty of time to edit. One other thing, would you know of any JS tools which might be helpful? The current list of active scripts is on my profile.