Thread:Nusdan/@comment-26481819-20150813053628/@comment-5645428-20150814234153

It hasn't been updated in a while, but Geometry Dash Wiki:Adminiatrators covers the kind of things we presently look for when deciding on promoting new administrators (or at least I do, being the author). While I do believe having small 'filters' on edit counts and activity levels is fair by encouraging contribution to the wiki before offering opportunities of promotion, that should be as far as any prerequisites go. Nothing could be more artificially limiting on a user's perceived suitability for the admininistrator role. It should be based upon their actions, as has been discussed above. Then and only then will you find someone who's right for the job. In this instance, I believe elections cannot quite achieve this, as how the staff interact with each other is especially important in the scheme of things. Some wikis might work on a community concensus here, but trust in their current staff's selection should suffice, and they may always politely express concerns if they they really there is an issue.

I would be interested in people's interpretation of the the administrator site article. @GS Irber, have a look at it if you're in the feel of drafting and see if you can identify anything that could be improved.