Board Thread:Off Topic/@comment-25406802-20180521165245/@comment-25651575-20180602070149

Sonar553 wrote:

And let me tell you, I am not impressed with such activity.

edgy

In all seriousness, I don't think a low edit count is that much of a problem. If anything, it shows (at least to me) that the wiki is near-perfect regarding the current version of the game, or at least approaching that point.

This game isn't updated often, it doesn't have a huge ARG to dive into and theorise over, and save for perhaps a few trivia points, this wiki does not change to reflect the ever-evolving playerbase and influx of user content. Compared to what's actually available in the full release of the game, this wiki limits itself only to documenting the specific aspects that rarely if ever change outside of updates, which can take months if not years to arrive at this point in the game's development. The last update was

I myself feel that we shouldn't encourage or even force edits where they're not necessary - if it ain't broke, don't fix it - and I haven't yet seen a page and thought gee, someone should really get round to fixing that soon.