Board Thread:Wiki General Discussion/@comment-17897872-20151229041259/@comment-25407271-20151229113056

I hate to be the guy whose opinion is different from everybody.

Voting Room: The name doesn't fit anymore, we aren't voting on who's the best "staff" (and if we did, we already know who'd win) nor who may or may not get a promotion, either way it's useless; a new name should suffice. On topic, I'll agree in this thing only if it's constructive criticism against the staff and not a 1-100% rating like the older thread, as in, typing the mistakes of the mentioned staff and give an ordered list about how can you change them, not a personal opinion, but a very generalised view. Or else, this will turn into a Comedy Central Roast and no one will care.

Rollback: Just nah. Do we really need them? Once again, I'd agree on this if only we had massive waves of vandalism everyday or very often, but we're a very small wiki with a very little recognizance. As once mentioned by Hackey, rollbacks' edits can't be seen in the recent activity, they are ghosts, and we'd rather see people that is editing and helping in the Wiki. Besides, we aren't big either and we don't have a lot to protect. Disagreed.