Thread:ZOptic/@comment-5645428-20170301114424/@comment-25407271-20170302005122

I am not explaining nor justifying ZOptic's determination to make such an answer, I responded the interrogations you made to him, to you. He messaged me to explain to me what he was doing and nothing that he said is on me, let alone motivated in any of my belief. What he said is on him and he heard my point of view of each circumstance, but by no mean am I personally plotting against you and neither do I solicit "deception". You know very well I do not talk behind anyone's back, I say the things that I need to say personally and that is one of the purposes you called me out for what I had told Prime about him leaving, and pretty much the reason half this place hates it when I have to speak. I am in no way associated to ZOptic's message.

Except now, that makes two, two individuals who share the undermining viewpoint of me, and I am unable to distinguish any difference between the two. Whatever you sought to achieve, at least, you could have acknowledged that there was a mixed involvement, but you did not. You could have submitted the message yourself, Nusdan, seeing you are the one having to explain it, but you did not.

Sure, turn the entire thing on me because I cleared out your questions. I share no "undermining" viewpoint of you, what in the actual hell is going through your mind as you read all of this? That since I happen to agree to disagree with point views of you I am endeavoring to team up with Kody to discredit you? If you are presuming this was planned through, you are in one big damn misunderstanding. How fucking dare you think that I am capable of administering a hypothetical resistance fronting you when you and I have discussed our stand of one another multiple times?

At the very beginning of my post I cleared out what I agreed with:

I agreed to the idea of the inadequate interaction that arose from you to us...

Which I have personally discussed with you countless times... and then I cleared out what he meant by the "reckon" thing because he explained it to me:

He means that people do not risk to argue with you anything that involves the growth of the wiki because you have conveyed the image of imposition...

Something that you agreed with in the very beginning of your post:

Inspecting my previous comment, I understand that the tone of it may have been perceived as being somewhat imposing...

So excuse me, but do not turn this shitstorm on me. I thank you very much for taking my loyalty and my word as a god damn joke.