Thread:3primetime3/@comment-25407271-20170328031249/@comment-5645428-20170330104034

I see where you're both coming from, but I will address the following from Nusdan:

Your point is invalid and I am not willing to accept sentimental thoughts either. Come back at me with something that makes sense in the form of an argument to discuss with factual topics and then we will see how it turns. Cheers.

This is condescending and in my mind is the kind of thing one receives from 'teenage arguers' in the sense that they are still developing in their ability to rationally discuss subjects and feel the need to criticise the form of their opponent's relatively sound argument and diminish impression of their competency to discuss, rather than strongly reinforce and conclude their own argument. Yes, I am doing it myself here, but only to outline that it is the subject of the matter that is important when there is no question that both of you are capable of discussing such matters competently.

This was the reason I thought we were supposed to post an announcement that clarified the appropriate conduct in relation to the use of profanities. I still don't know what conclusion that came to, so I don't see much change or rest resulting from this discussion. I suggest each of you and the staff follow through in establishing what exactly this policy is supposed to entail, because I'm not doing it. :3