Thread:Hackey5/@comment-25407271-20170525215252

If you and I were friends in real life I would probably be your worst nightmare because I would be texting you every 2 minutes to rant, I would even hate myself.

Hello, Hycko. This is not a rant, but a general question. Put me out of my doubt.

Why are the levels submitted not subsequently rated by the amazing staff that we have? I mean, I have scrolled down a little and the comments that I have seen come from either Mew or you accepting a submitted level. While I can see why some of them were instantly accepted like this level, I perceive that levels are being rated by one or two without the overall consent of the rest of the staff. Yeah, I feel like I am wrong but I need your juicy opinions all the time to make me feel better.

On the other hand, I think it is time that we enhance our requirements to better standards or this whole project simply fails in the future. With a submission like Luis', any other level submitted is put to shame since no one in this place is at his level (or higher) except for certain people (e.g SirHadoken or AirSwipe who stopped coming long ago). The whole thing is unbalanced and unfair if an addition like any of those's creation is chosen.

Moreover, I see two requirements that are redundant:
 * At least one minute of gameplay footage (not editor footage)
 * At least twice as much gameplay footage as other video content (intros, menu browsing, fails, etc.)

The second requirement is just the first one, longer and complicated. If the video is 50 minutes long but the level plays for a minute then that's it, I don't see the need to type down that other rule whatsoever.

And a rule that I don't understand: Complies with site policy at the discretion of the staff.



Reply to this thing, too.

''See you next time, Hycko. XOXO.'' 