Thread:Hackey5/@comment-27022259-20160530165918/@comment-27022259-20160611140843

The only con I may think of, if any, to an abundance of content moderators is that some may perceive it as unfair.

The reason I thought it was unfair was primarily because you promoted Kane to discussions moderator in addition to content moderator. I wouldn't care if he was a chat/content moderator, considering, in my opinion, it takes way more skill to deal with the community (no offense) rather than the pages because monitoring the chat requires real time activity, and the forums you have to constantly check to see if there is any rule-breaking activites constantly. Therefore, a chat mod would have to prove themselves worthy of a discussions moderator tag. At least that's what everybody else had to do, and it's only fair for the people who actually worked for it.

As for Content Moderator, I don't really care. It shouldn't take a whole lot of brainpower to monitor the wiki. In fact, I think it would be quite nice considering it would be way easier to deal with vandalism, and Hackey knows a recent incident where an abundance of content moderators would have been extremely useful.