Thread:Hackey5/@comment-25407271-20171014213103/@comment-26498914-20171018091008

Just my two cents, I overall agree with Nusdan. Sure, let people be bold, let them edit. But there are articles as such as those of the first levels that will most likely never ever need to be touched again, but people would do it just so they can say "I made an edit yay!" and then have us revert it. There are other articles. There is a banner that pretty much says "Hey, this is a quality article and has been reviewed. Don't touch it unless there is something very relevant.", what is the difference between said banner and locking the page?